Morbi bridge collapse: Victims wait for answers month after tragedy
“When my father ended up being alive, he’d tell me personally every to stay and learn day. Now that will verify i really do that?”

Vandana Makwana, 15, can not hold back tears as she speaks about her father Mahesh, who died on 30 October when a footbridge collapsed within the western suggest that is indian of, plunging a huge selection of people into a river.
Vandana’s dad and two brothers had been on the list of 135 individuals killed in the tragedy – a lot of the victims were young ones.
The bridge – built in the nineteenth Century – had been a tourist that is popular in Gujarat’s Morbi district and had reopened just times ahead of the collapse after repairs.
The private firm contracted with maintaining the bridge, was not given a safety certification before reopening it following the tragedy, Morbi municipality officials said that Oreva. Additionally they reported that they were unaware that the connection had been open to the general public, though a huge number of individuals have been visiting the spot.
At the website of the accident, police personnel take turns to guard the scrap metal left after the collapse – bits of broken cables, aluminium floor sheets, bolts – and day night. This debris is currently an element of the proof for the authorities investigation.
There is absolutely no memorial at the site, absolutely nothing to mark that for a evening a month ago, the lives of a huge selection of everyone was changed forever super fast of the second sunday.
But also for the grouped families of the victims, the anger and anguish stay.
Vandana’s grandfather, Vashram Makwana, asks why law enforcement haven’t taken any action yet against senior officials.
“just how could the bridge be operated without their knowledge?” that he asks.
PK Jadeja, the deputy superintendent of Morbi police, told BBC Gujarati that he couldn’t discuss the “senior officials” being questioned in the “case at this time”.
Their state government suspended the Morbi municipality chief days following the tragedy.
Every day after the accident, police arrested nine people, including Oreva staff, solution enthusiasts and safety guards at the bridge. They truly are in judicial custody after their bail plea ended up being rejected.
But no senior Oreva official, including owner Jaysukhbhai Patel, was called in case or questioned to date. In reality, Mr Patel – who was simply filmed praising the grade of the repair work on the right time of the bridge’s reopening – will not be seen in public places since the event.
The Morbi district court and also the Gujarat High Court are hearing situations which are split the event.
In accordance with a written report that is forensic by prosecutors in an area court, the rusted cables that were giving support to the connection had not been changed during repairs. Whilst the bridge’s capability ended up being around 100 people at the same time, significantly more than 3,000 seats have been in love with the for the accident day.
The Gujarat tall Court has sharply criticised the Morbi municipality and asked the national government to explain in more detail the action taken against officials whom needs to have overseen the healthiness of the bridge.
It has also expected the national government to supply more compensation to the victims, saying it was “abysmally in the reduced part”.
It’s an order that may offer some comfort to Mahesh Manvadariya and his wife Bintu. They now look after their nephew, five-year-old Jiyansh, who destroyed both their parents at Morbi.
Mr Manvadariya says that he wants to teach Jiyansh well but that the allowance that is month-to-month to kids orphaned by the tragedy – 3,000 rupees ($36; £30) – is inadequate. That he now hopes the national government will increase the compensation.
Bintu cries as she speaks about wanting to answer Jiyansh’s questions about where his parents have gone.
“We have told him that his parents have gone to meet his grandmother plus they are becoming stars now.”